Recruiter View · 1-minute read

Syed Najafi

M.S. Mechanical Engineering · Michigan Technological University · 4.00 GPA

Analysis concentration · 18 months industry experience · DOE-funded research

Mechanical engineer at the intersection of simulation fidelity and experimental validation. Specializes in thermal management, structural FEA, and multi-physics simulation. Available for a 6–12 month full-time co-op. Currently based in Houghton, MI — open to relocation.

Headline Outcomes

55kW/(m²·K)

Boiling HTC (AI chip cooling)

35%

Design failure probability ↓ (Triveni)

50%

Engineering cycle time ↓ (Triveni)

4.00GPA

Graduate GPA · Michigan Tech

−20dB

Sound power ↓ (GE LM2500 enclosure)

01 Sep 2025 – Dec 2025

Engine Pressure DAQ

Identified dominant intake resonance at 1.5 engine orders (37.5 Hz) — a counter-intuitive finding overriding the expected third-order firing frequency. Implicated manifold geometry as the primary misfire driver, informing a plenum redesign. Validated the 1D simulation framework for design-space exploration.

1.5 orders

Resonance @ 37.5 Hz

Detail →
02 Feb 2023 – Jan 2024

Marine Shaftline

Identified and eliminated an unloaded Plummer block bearing (root cause of no-load vibration), reducing design failure by 15% and cutting successive-project engineering time by 17%. Achieved 30% friction reduction in journal bearings, 60% leakage reduction in shaft seal with 18% weight reduction, and 30% improved heat dissipation in thrust pads.

15 %

Failure probability ↓

Detail →
03 Jul 2022 – Jan 2023

GE LM2500 Enclosure

Reduced constrained space usage by 20% without compromising access. Achieved −20 dB sound power reduction. Cut transmitted vibration by 15% via shock mounts. Structural margin > 5% above DVP&R spec. System passed GE compliance review at first submission.

−20 dB

Sound power reduction

Detail →
04 Jan 2026 – Apr 2026

Buckled Beam Dynamics

Achieved consistent agreement across mode shapes, natural frequencies, and nonlinear force-response amplitudes between all analytical methods and FEA. Identified which method best captures large-amplitude response with highest fidelity.

3 methods

Modal vs Galerkin vs Direct

Detail →

May 2025 – Jul 2025

Graduate Research Assistant

CFAM Lab

3D PTVLaVision DAQANSYS Fluent

Jul 2022 – Jan 2024

Design Engineer

Triveni Engineering & Industries Ltd.

PTC CreoSolidWorksANSYS Workbench

Jul 2019 – Aug 2019

Mechanical Engineer Intern

Automotive Axles Ltd. (Cummins Inc.)

Manufacturing drawingsProcess mappingKaizen

Contact

Ready when
you are.

Want depth? Switch to Explorer View